Fatigue risk model inputs and outputs
Fatigue risk models turn structured information about a work pattern into modelled estimates of fatigue exposure. This page explains, in plain English, the typical inputs these models use and the outputs they produce — and why the outputs are only as reliable as the inputs.
It is not legal advice. Different tools use different inputs; there is no single universal set.
Typical inputs
Section titled “Typical inputs”Depending on the model and how a tool is configured, common inputs include:
| Input | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Shift start and finish times | When work happens affects fatigue through the body clock — see timing and circadian effects |
| Shift duration | Longer duties can increase time at lower alertness |
| Night work and early starts | These coincide with the circadian low and can compress sleep — see night shift fatigue and early starts and fatigue |
| Rest between shifts | Determines realistic sleep opportunity before the next duty |
| Consecutive duties | Fatigue can build across a run of shifts — see cumulative fatigue in models |
| Breaks | Within-shift recovery affects the job/break component — see workload, breaks and fatigue models |
| Workload / job demand | Vigilance-heavy or physically demanding work can add fatigue where the model supports it |
| Commute / travel | Some organisational policies include travel burden — see duty, travel, and commute |
Not every model uses every input, and not every model uses identical inputs. Travel handling in particular varies — there is no single commute assumption that applies universally.
Typical outputs
Section titled “Typical outputs”Models based on HSE RR446 commonly produce two related outputs:
- Fatigue Index (FI) — a modelled estimate of the likelihood of very high sleepiness during the duty.
- Risk Index (RI) — a modelled estimate of relative risk compared with a reference pattern.
See Fatigue Index vs Risk Index for how these differ. Both are modelled estimates of relative exposure — not measures of real-time alertness, and not legal compliance thresholds.
Some tools also break outputs down by the underlying components (timing, cumulative, and job/breaks) so reviewers can see why a pattern scores as it does.
Why output quality depends on input quality
Section titled “Why output quality depends on input quality”A model can only work with the information it is given. Common input problems and their effects:
| Input problem | Effect on output |
|---|---|
| Missing earlier shifts in the schedule | Cumulative estimate wrong — often the largest error |
| Planned times entered when actual hours differed | Underestimates exposure after overtime or overruns |
| Unrealistic break assumptions | Understates within-shift demand |
| Incorrect day/night classification | Misaligns the timing estimate |
| Wrong or absent travel data | Misstates total burden where travel is in scope |
This is why comparing planned vs actual fatigue matters — outputs based on an out-of-date plan can look reassuring while real exposure has changed.
Interpreting outputs responsibly
Section titled “Interpreting outputs responsibly”- Outputs may indicate which patterns are likely to be more tiring — they can support review, not replace it.
- A favourable output does not prove a shift is safe; an unfavourable one does not automatically mean work cannot proceed.
- Outputs should be interpreted with competent judgement, alongside worker feedback and wider fatigue risk assessment.
- Any thresholds applied to outputs are organisational policy thresholds that may vary.
For the boundaries of what models can and cannot tell you, see limitations of fatigue models.
Practical steps
Section titled “Practical steps”- Enter accurate schedule history — include preceding shifts and rest, not just the duty being assessed.
- Use actual hours where reviewing what really happened.
- Be honest about breaks and workload rather than assuming best case.
- Record assumptions — what was entered, and who reviewed it — see fatigue records and audit.
- Reassess when timings, travel, or assignments change materially.
Related pages
Section titled “Related pages”- Fatigue risk index (FRI)
- Fatigue Index vs Risk Index (FI vs RI)
- Biomathematical fatigue models
- Duty, travel, and commute
- Breaks and recovery during shifts
- Roster design principles
- Planned vs actual fatigue
- Limitations of fatigue models
References
Section titled “References”- Fatigue and risk index calculator guide (RR446 supplementary PDF) — HSE description of inputs, the three components, and FI/RI outputs
- RR446 — The development of a fatigue / risk index for shiftworkers — HSE research report (2006)
- Managing shift work (HSG256) — factors to consider in shift work risk assessment
- Fatigue — HSE — using tools within wider fatigue risk assessment